Some of the world’s earliest life forms may have been captured in squiggles found in ancient rocks from Greenland.
The
rocks were part of the seafloor 3.7 billion years ago, and the wavy
lines, just a few centimetres across, would be remnants of primordial
microbial colonies called stromatolites.
The evidence is presented in the academic journal Nature.
If confirmed, the colonies would predate the previously oldest known fossils by over 200 million years.
To put that in context, travelling back a similar time from today would be to leap into the world of the first dinosaurs.
But all claims of extremely early life are hotly contested, and this find is as well.
The
find was made in a desolate expanse of uplands that butt up against the
Greenland ice cap, called the Isua Supercrustal Belt.
The host rocks were exposed only recently after permanent snow cover melted.
The region is famous in geoscience because it is the oldest surviving piece of the Earth’s surface.
And in the late 1990s, Minik Rosing, a native Greenlander and
professor of geology at the Natural History Museum of Denmark,
identified chemical traces of life in its rocks – layers of carbon that
had evidently once been part of living bacteria (although this
interpretation has also been contested).
Prof Rosing suggests
those bacteria lived in the surface of the ocean, capturing sunlight and
photosynthesising, until they died and “rained down” to the seabed.
The layers of carbon are interleaved with volcanic ash that may have come from a nearby island.
The stromatolites described by Martin van Kranendonk and colleagues in this week’s issue of Nature would have lived in a quite different way.
Stromatolites are effectively living rocks formed of mineral grains glued together by sticky, colonial bacteria.
They
are rare today – the best known are in the harsh waters of Shark Bay,
Western Australia, where bacteria slide up through each new layer of
sediment washed up by the tides.
Similar mounds found in the
Western Australian outback are currently the oldest acknowledged fossils
on the planet, at 3.48 billion years old.
The older examples now
claimed for Greenland appear to be remarkably similar, says Prof van
Kranendonk, an early-Earth expert at the University of New South Wales.
“We
see the original unaltered sedimentary layers, and we can see how the
stromatolite structures grow up through the sedimentary layering. And we
can see the characteristic dome and cone-shaped forms of modern
stromatolites.”
The fossil structures are overlain by another thick layer of sediment
– a sign the bacterial mats were fatally buried by mud or sand, perhaps
during a storm.
“There’s plenty of evidence this was a shallow-water environment,” Prof van Kranendonk suggests.
“We can see the sands and rocks were moved around by energetic waves.”
The
stromatolites themselves are limestone – precipitated out of the
coastal waters by the original microorganisms, more evidence the
researchers say that these are truly ancient.
There are no traces
of the original microbes, only the mounds they built. But that is still
incredibly important, says Prof van Kranendonk.
“This helps us
think about how life developed on Earth, how fast that process was. It
pushes everything back a little further, narrows the window between when
we know nothing, and when we begin to know something.”
Prof
Rosing, however, disagrees with almost every aspect of the analysis. The
claim, he says, depends on the belief the samples come from a rare,
well-preserved part of the original seabed. But since they were first
part of the Earth’s surface, the Isua rocks have been twisted,
stretched, crushed, and cooked by tectonic forces; the region is a
geological “train-wreck” in the words of another geologist.
For
example, Prof Rosing argues, the carbonate minerals far from being
original biological precipitates, were produced far later, by reactions
involving scalding soda water deep in the Earth’s crust.
The
lines showing internal laminations, said to be primordial sedimentary
layers, actually show where those waters percolated through the buried
rocks. As for the dome- and cone-forms of the fossils, those are typical
shapes seen where rocks of different strengths have been squeezed and
stretched.
“It’s clear from the pictures in the paper that these are highly deformed rocks,”
The problem is familiar in early Earth science – so much has happened
to the rocks over geological history, it is hard to know what is
original and what is an overprint by later processes.
Many claims of early fossils have fallen on close examination. Only a few survive the intense scrutiny of peer review.
Prof
van Kranendonk stands by his argument that amidst the overall
punishment suffered by the Greenland rocks, small pockets have survived
well preserved – including the outcrop at the heart of this dispute.
“They’re just exceptional windows of preservation, which give us the keys to what happened so long ago.”
Geobiologist
Michael Tice from Texas A&M University, US, who refereed the paper
and approved its publication, takes a half-way position.
“The
trouble with this kind of science is you’re trying to look at life after
geology has done all the nastiest things to it. You’re limited by
nature. The study is not definitive, but the evidence has passed all the
tests they could apply.
"The point of publication is to stimulate more effort to find other examples.”
Prof
Rosing agrees that a joint visit to examine the rocks in their original
setting in Isua would be the best way to resolve the dispute. And Prof
van Kranendonk hopes there may be further examples, older ones even, in
the Greenland record.
What unites them is the belief that almost
as far back as the rock record goes, life had already taken hold on the
Earth. And the desire to know more about what that life was like.
Comments
Post a Comment
Welcome.......
What are you thinking of....!!